 |
The VH Trade Site Forums Archives
This is the Archives page for the Van Halen Trade Forums.
VH Trade Site - Van Halen Bootlegs and Boot TradingThe complete, definitive Van Halen bootleg, CD, CD-R, DVD, DVD-R, VCD, and tape trading site.
Both the experienced and novice bootleg trader or collector will find something of value here. VHTrading.com is set up for those who want to trade rare and unreleased Van Halen, David Lee Roth, Sammy Hagar, and Gary Cherone recordings, plus Fan Forums, lists of Audio and video boots, set lists, classifieds, articles, and much more!
|
| To view the "live" version of the forums page, go here: http://www.vhtrading.com/forums/index.php.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Chris UK
Joined: 2001-05-18
Posts: 2637
Location: Staffordshire, United Kingdom
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 4:16 am Post subject: VHT Awards confusion over procedure? |
|
|
I jusr want to clear up some possible confusion about how the award are going to work....
Maybe I didnt explain how this is going to work well enough initially but.... I think several of you have got the wrong idea about the nominations. The nominations are just that, nomiating people or things to go into the actual poll later on.... the nonimations are not the actuall awards poll its self. With nominations, you only really need one nomination for each different nominee. Yet I see people nominating the same thing 10 times (ie Napalm as DVD Boot of the Year). I'm just looking for different nominees..... then I will set up the actual awards poll in about a weeks time.
Also can I remind everybody that these are the 2005 Awards I see some nominees who have done some great work for VHT in the past but have done very little in 2005. Please dont vote for your all time favorite, thats not what the awards are about.
I know we are a way into 2006 now, but if these awards are a sucess then hopefully we can run them again next year. if so I think we should run them in January from then on.
However I am really pleased to see so many people getting involved, thanks for your time + thoughts :thumb: It has made me realise just how many great tallented people we have in our midsts. In a sense we have a little cottage industry here with filmers, archivists, restorators, authors, artists, distributors and collectors all working together.
Cheers,
Chris. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Decatone
Joined: 2004-08-23
Posts: 971
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chris, I see what you mean, how many people are needed for each catagory?
What about putting up a rough draft from the response already, then people can see what the short falls are, then only post to fill those positions, untill there is enough?
Just an idea? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Chris UK
Joined: 2001-05-18
Posts: 2637
Location: Staffordshire, United Kingdom
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Decatone wrote: Chris, I see what you mean, how many people are needed for each catagory?
What about putting up a rough draft from the response already, then people can see what the short falls are, then only post to fill those positions, untill there is enough?
Just an idea?
A minimum of 3 nominees are needed per category. I like your idea of a rough draft but I dont have time to do it right now. I will probably leave it now and do all the hard work on Friday which is my day off.
Thanx,
Chris. |
|
| Back to top |
|
mfc
Joined: 2004-07-31
Posts: 1183
Location: Rochester, NY
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chris UK wrote:
A minimum of 3 nominees are needed per category. I like your idea of a rough draft but I dont have time to do it right now. I will probably leave it now and do all the hard work on Friday which is my day off.
Thanx,
Chris.
Ah, I think I read this as stating each nominee needed 3 votes to be considered. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|